Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Hand and Eye
What's this? The same pose drawn by two different artists? Two drawings by the same artist, three years apart? Nope. These drawings were both done by me, this morning, one right after the other. Both sketches from the same photograph (obviously,) both took about the same amount of time.
But the second one stands head and shoulders above the first in quality. Why?
This morning I was doing some quick sketches with pixielovely.com's figure and gesture drawing tool (a fantastically useful device.) After filling sheet after sheet of copy paper with quick, hasty sketches, I came across a rather tricky pose—this woman sitting with her arms and legs folded awkwardly around her body. Unsurprisingly, I had a bit of trouble getting her pose down. And I realized that for the last several sketches I'd been paying more attention to the podcast I was listening to than the lines I was putting down.
When a sketch isn't going well, the best thing to do is start over, so I did. This time I spent a longer period of time just looking at the photo, without drawing. When I drew, I took more care to draw through the form and analyze the position of her body, applying a few of the things I’ve been learning about gesture drawing from Vilpu and Stanchfield's books.
The result is that the first drawing is sloppy, ugly and superficial. The second drawing has a better sense of gesture and form, was more fun to draw and even took a little less time.
So, why am I bothering to blog about this? Why am I moved to admit to all the internet that I drew that awful first image? Well, most places a person might go to learn about the craft of drawing, whether we're talking about art school, books about drawing or even tutorials online, will emphasize the importance of work and practice. Of doing drawing after drawing after drawing, not worrying about how well they’re going to turn out, just doing them. And I can’t stress this enough, this is very, very important. All these sources are right to stress the importance of practice. No one has ever developed great skill in art without hours and hours of practice.
But. That said, I'm going to let you in on a secret that every successful artist understands, but is rarely mentioned.
Practice is not enough. Not on its own. With all the (quite necessary) emphasis on "getting the reps in" and developing muscle memory, sometimes we forget how important it is to stop, think and see. This is why there are some people who never break a certain barrier in their artwork despite drawing hours upon hours every day. It's also why some people's artwork consistently improves even after years of success.
Even a very simple drawing, a character pinup or a still life or a small scene, has a hundred thousand potential problems and approaches an artist can consider. Problems of form, line, storytelling, stylization, abstraction, hard geometry, lighting, texture, rendering, perspective, expressiveness, contrast, anatomy, gesture, dynamism, composition, symbolism, acting, psychology, physicality...the list goes on and on. True masterpieces consider many of these things at once, integrating dozens of difficult-to-master skills and techniques to create a drawing or painting or print or sculpture that still holds up decades after its completion and has enough weight to be studied and revisited again and again.
This isn't to say a good artist will never sketch absently. Just as not every drawing is going to be good and not every day will be your best day, not everything you draw is going to be very considered or intelligent. But it's something important to keep in mind, especially if you feel you're hitting a wall with your craftsmanship. That's when it's time to look at those who came before you and see what you can learn from them, to try something different or consider a problem you would usually ignore.
The hand and arm are indispensable. But they are nothing without the brain and the eye.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Facebook doodles
Monday, August 15, 2011
What I've been wasting my time on (part 1)
At HeroesCon, I attended an unusual panel. It was unusual in that everyone involved with the panel agreed up front that the panel was an inherently foolish idea. The panel was on humor.
You can probably guess where this is going. Trying to analyze humor can produce some interesting ideas and rarely produces anything remotely funny. There's a quote about killing frogs that sums up the idea, one alternately attributed to E. B. White and Mark Twain and if you haven't heard it yet I'm sure a little considered Googling will turn it up. My point is no one wants to talk about comedy, which is fine. It had Evan Dorkin and Roger Langridge talking about comics which was enough to put my ass in the seat.
Mostly it was just entertaining. But there was one bit of practical advice tossed out there that I came away with very grateful for. Dorkin (speaking obviously from experience) spoke of how a freeform humor anthology was a great format, because you could pull out any random idea you had sitting around and use it. And if it worked, great, if it didn't, it was only a page or two.
That advice was spot on, especially for someone like me who often writes in the short form and has a lot of very bad ideas. I mean, terrible ideas. Look at that Meatloaf comic. Seriously. But now it's out of my head and I can move on. And that feeling is so, so freeing.
It's working for me so far. I'd recommend it to anyone who had an interest.
You can probably guess where this is going. Trying to analyze humor can produce some interesting ideas and rarely produces anything remotely funny. There's a quote about killing frogs that sums up the idea, one alternately attributed to E. B. White and Mark Twain and if you haven't heard it yet I'm sure a little considered Googling will turn it up. My point is no one wants to talk about comedy, which is fine. It had Evan Dorkin and Roger Langridge talking about comics which was enough to put my ass in the seat.
Mostly it was just entertaining. But there was one bit of practical advice tossed out there that I came away with very grateful for. Dorkin (speaking obviously from experience) spoke of how a freeform humor anthology was a great format, because you could pull out any random idea you had sitting around and use it. And if it worked, great, if it didn't, it was only a page or two.
That advice was spot on, especially for someone like me who often writes in the short form and has a lot of very bad ideas. I mean, terrible ideas. Look at that Meatloaf comic. Seriously. But now it's out of my head and I can move on. And that feeling is so, so freeing.
It's working for me so far. I'd recommend it to anyone who had an interest.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Architecture Journal!
I started an architecture journal as an exercise this past term, and have been combining it with my sketching in ink. It's off to a somewhat slow start but I like it...Savannah has so many weirdly different architectural styles. They often really, really don't mesh well, to be honest. But that's the fun part--seeing an attempt at art deco next to a bank with a portico next to a crumbling dutch colonial style house. All of these are bits of architecture from buildings I sketched around Savannah--yes, even the portico, like I said, it's on a bank.
For every building I drew that day there were a dozen more I saw that I vowed to sketch when I had the time. So much weird architecture in Savannah.
Ha. And here's proof I don't do underdrawing when I sketch in ink. Bet you didn't know Savannah had a church whose buttresses tilted at a 45 degree angle, huh? Sometimes going straight to ink with no underdrawing works out well, but for every image that turns out like this:
There are at least three that turn out like this:
Monday, June 6, 2011
Back from HeroesCon!
The con went well! My sales were only so-so, but it was worth it to meet so many delightful people. And the con sketches were so very fun. At first the requests were pretty straightforward, a lot of superhero cheesecake.
At one point I realized that my octopus prints:
...Were popular, so I stuck one up on the front of my booth. That was when the sketch requests got awesome. People love(craft) the tentacles, and I love con goers who tailor their sketch requests to what they think the artist might like to draw. Soon everything I drew had tentacles.
There was a lovely lady named Holly at the Top Shelf booth who was asking for sea monsters:
And a downright adorable couple who asked me to draw them as "Mister and Missus Cthulhu:"
On the non-tentacular side of things...since Pickles, Becca, Heidi and I registered as "Rascals, Rogues and Dames" a gentleman came up to us with sketchbook themed for Rogues and Rascals:
But by far the highlight of the sketches was an awesome new father who was walking around with sharpie pens and cotton onesies, asking people to do a sketch for his unborn daughter to wear once she popped out! I was thrilled. More than a little honored, frankly. After some consideration I offered this:
So cute! My only regret is there were so many sketches I failed to photograph, or whose photos turned out blurry. Ah well. I'll leave you with a shot of JokerButt.
At one point I realized that my octopus prints:
...Were popular, so I stuck one up on the front of my booth. That was when the sketch requests got awesome. People love(craft) the tentacles, and I love con goers who tailor their sketch requests to what they think the artist might like to draw. Soon everything I drew had tentacles.
There was a lovely lady named Holly at the Top Shelf booth who was asking for sea monsters:
And a downright adorable couple who asked me to draw them as "Mister and Missus Cthulhu:"
On the non-tentacular side of things...since Pickles, Becca, Heidi and I registered as "Rascals, Rogues and Dames" a gentleman came up to us with sketchbook themed for Rogues and Rascals:
(Cue wah-wah trumpet at visual pun)
But by far the highlight of the sketches was an awesome new father who was walking around with sharpie pens and cotton onesies, asking people to do a sketch for his unborn daughter to wear once she popped out! I was thrilled. More than a little honored, frankly. After some consideration I offered this:
So cute! My only regret is there were so many sketches I failed to photograph, or whose photos turned out blurry. Ah well. I'll leave you with a shot of JokerButt.
(Let it haunt your dreams)
Friday, April 22, 2011
An Intimate Lecture
I've been unreasonably pokey about putting this comic up here, but now more! I finished this ages ago (well, a week or two--which is years in Sequential Time) and now I post it for all to see. It's called An Intimate Lecture.
I'll be selling this mini at Fluke and Heroescon, along with plenty of others.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Scraps from a mini
For the past week or so I've been working on a minicomic about a scholar and a prostitute. I've been trying out a few different modes of drawing for this one, and I think I'm going to take a good long break from ink washes once this is done.
I've been tooling around with just how much, if any pencil I should use. On small single images, I like the look I get when I don't pencil and just sketch in ink, but for a comic that becomes a little harder. I need to sketch at least a little bit first or there is very little panel to panel consistency. And I definitely need to sketch the faces first and go over them with a bit of precision, or else the expressions communicate very little.
I actually drew all these on separate sheets of paper. Sometimes the foreground and the background are even on separate sheets. I'm in the process of arranging them into a (hopefully) coherent comic now, and doing the lettering. I'm not sure how much I'm behind that process. On one hand, I like the way it makes them all feel disposable. It creates something low pressure which allows me a great deal of freedom. On the other hand, even though I've thumbnailed these pages out I didn't work on them arranged as they will be on the page. I've found myself changing the format around a lot, and I think the overall coherency suffers. I think in the future I'll go back to drawing on the page.
Though, there are a few interesting things that happen what you do a panel on a completely separate page. With this one, I'd originally intended to cut off the panel around the scholar's thighs. Hence why I basically just scribbled in his legs without thinking. But as silly as those legs look, I'm kind of liking the way the whole image with the blank areas and all look.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
You get some wolves today
Monday, March 21, 2011
More Ink Sketches
More ink sketches! These are all just a little bit old, and since I made them I've been working on a comic done in a similar fashion to these. I'm playing with different ways of drawing in ink. A lot of people have encouraged me to go without underdrawing like I did with these, and just go straight to ink, but my early attempts at that were a little mixed. I think going straight to ink works for sketches, but if I'm doing characters existing together in an environment that's meant to look consistent and convincing, I think I'm better off with just a little underdrawing, even (especially) if it's really sketchy.
I've started on a minicomic about that mustachioed man and a prostitute. I'll post some stuff from that up here soon.
Labels:
frippery,
ink,
moustaches,
prostitutes,
sketches
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)